Pages

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Why Study The Old Testament?

INTRODUCTION to my book “The Sacrificial System”
Why Should We Study
The Old Testament?
(Complete free copy can be downloaded
just leave a comment making a request)

One might ask, “Why should a Christian study a series of lessons from the Old Testament?” Don’t we live this side of the cross? Don’t we live under the New Testament of our Lord and Savior who died and with that death established his “Last Will and Testament? The obvious answer to these questions to a student of the word of God is “YES.” We are now living live this side of the cross of Jesus. We live under the “Last Will and Testament” the “New Testament” of our Lord. This is the law that will judge all who have lived after the death of our Lord. Again then if this is correct, why would we study at length a series of lessons from the “OLD LAW?”
For the answer let us turn to God’s word which shall give us the reason for such an endeavor. Turn with me and read from the book of Romans ( Romans 15:4) where Paul writes: “ For whatsoever were written were written aforetime were written for our learning, that through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope” Turn with me now to the book of Galatians (Galatians 3:24-25 ) where we read these words: “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come we are no longer under a schoolmaster.” [ please note that throughout our study we will be quoting from the King James Edition of the Bible ]
From the passages we must conclude that what was written “aforetime” that is to say that which was written prior to the writing of the book of Romans ( in particular the reference is clearly to the Old Law ) were written and preserved for a purpose which God had. That purpose was that God’s children might through the reading of them have learning and knowledge and through study of them might learn patience and understanding. The text also says that through these scriptures we might have comfort in their reading and might be made more aware of the hope God has planned for us in eternity.
Further we learn from the second scripture from Galatians that the Old Law the Old Testament was to serve as a schoolmaster to bring us to the realization of Christ. The Greek word here is paidagosos (paidagosos) which means a guide, a guardian of children. What Paul is saying is that the Old Testament was to serve a purpose, that preparing the learner for the coming Messiah ( Christ ). It was to establish the need of a Savior as the Law was incapable of bringing men to perfection ( a right standing with God ). Our Old Testament was to bring man to the realization of their own inadequacies and a need for one who would take their place. It was to bring man to the startling fact that in order to please God it was going to require “Faith” and not simply works as the Old Law practiced.
To this end we too must follow their example and study with earnest desires the Old Testament with these same thoughts in mind: How do these scriptures cause me to learn more of God and His will for me?; How do these scriptures bring me the true knowledge of patience and hope in Christ?; How do they bring me to greater faith in the Lord?
For these reasons alone we ought to desire to learn all we can from those words of God recorded and preserved for our benefit. Yes we live under a new and better law, but to neglect the rich studies of the Old Testament is to miss so much of what God’s overall plan for man is.

Why Study The
Tabernacle With
It’s Sacrifices?

For an answer to this question we again would as for God’s guidance from His Holy Word. Turn with me to the book of Hebrews ( Hebrews 8:1-2 ) for a look at what God has to say through His inspired writer. “Now of things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such a high priest, who is set on the right of the throne of the Majesty in the. heavens; A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.”
Once again let us turn to the book of Hebrews ( Hebrews 10:1 ) where we read the following: “For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers hereunto perfect.
From these two passages we would like to draw the following conclusions. When you see a shadow being cast you are made aware that there is something following that is casting that shadow. The shadow is not reality and at very best doesn’t but give a faint picture of what is reality. But the shadow does reveal something about the reality. These scriptures make it clear that the Old Law with its sacrificial system was but a shadow of the true the reality. The true what? The reality of what? The scriptures stated above clearly define our answers. The Old Testament tabernacle was the shadow. What then was the reality, that which was casting the shadow? The text says it is “ a true sanctuary which the Lord pitched, not man.” That is to say that this is in contrast to and earthly, temporary structure, the tabernacle to the true tabernacle of the Lord. It was to show the temporary nature of man’s life here upon the earth. It was a shadow of the reality in Christ. The word translated tabernacle literally means a tent, a temporary dwelling place, an abode. The question then arises; “Where then is the true tabernacle of God, that eternal abode, that place where God and Christ abide now in this life and in the final abode of the soul?” “What was casting a shadow that we read about in the books of Leviticus and in Numbers?” We contend and hope to prove through our study that the “TRUE TABERNACLE OF GOD” is now “THE LORD’S CHURCH” over which He now serves a “High Priest” over those of us who are His “Kingdom of Priests” (Revelation 1:5-6, 9 ) The Lord now has put an end to all animal sacrifices by offering Himself once for all for a complete sacrifice. ( Hebrews 10:12 )
For a further scriptural answer we turn to again the book of Hebrews (Hebrews 9:23 ). Here the writer says; “It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.” What then of the Old Testament things that were shadows of the true? Let us suggest the following for your consideration.

THE BOOK OF LAW ( THE SHADOW )
THE NEW COVENANT ( THE REALITY)

THE JEWISH PEOPLE ( THE SHADOW )
THE NEW TESTAMENT CHRISTIANS ( THE REALITY)

THE TABERNACLE ( THE SHADOW )
THE NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH ( THE REALITY)

THE VESSELS OF WORSHIP (THE SHADOW )
THE NEW TESTAMENT WORSHIP (THE REALITY)

THE HIGH PRIEST ( THE SHADOW )
OUR HIGH PRIEST JESUS THE CHRIST (THE REALITY)

THE ROYAL PRIESTHOOD (THE SHADOW )
THE KINGDOM OF PRIESTS ( THE REALITY)

THE YEARLY SACRIFICES ( THE SHADOW )
THE ONE TRUE SACRIFICE OF CHRIST (THE REALITY)

From these scriptures and our in-depth study we hope to see an even truer picture of Christ, His church, and God’s plan for man. Truly we can learn much from a study of this Old Testament Law with its sacrificial system. It is through these scriptures ( Leviticus and Numbers ) that we can see the place of our Lord’s dwelling now and in the redeemed church of heaven where we will serve God face to face in our own reality for all of eternity.
 May God richly bless each and every one of you who have given of your time to read and study from these few notes compiled for our mutual learning and growth in the true knowledge of Christ.
Throughout our study ask yourself this question: If this is the shadow under the Old Law what is the reality under the New Law which was casting the shadow?

This is but the introduction to the book I have written and taught from. The complete book can be yours to download. If you would be interested in a copy please leave me a comment and make sure to include your e-mail address. I will respond and attach a complete copy of the book in a PDF format that you can read with any Adobe Reader or other program that allows you to read PDF files. The file is rather large as the book is 169 pages complete with text, illustrations, charts and diagrams all which are suitable to teach from or share with others. Your e-mail address will not be shared with anyone. The download will be free of charge. I would ask though, if you enjoy it share it with others and consider making a small donation so I can continue to develop useful Christian literature in the future. May God bless you as you study from this book. My e-mail is heeaton@yahoo.com if you would rather make your request there.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

How Do You Catch A Monkey?

How Do You Catch A Monkey?
One of the oldest methods of catching a monkey is so simple you would seriously doubt it really works. A hunter merely cuts a small hole in a gourd, ties it to a tree, then places a few seeds inside the gourd. Soon a monkey happens by, and overwhelmed by curiosity, reaches through the tiny hole to explore. Feeling the seeds, he scoops hem up in his hand and tries to pull his fist out of the tiny hole.  To his dismay, he finds that he cannot free himself. He stubbornly refuses to let go of his precious treasure and keeps his fist closed until the hunter returns and captures him.
Oh, how pitiful to witness the thousands of people trapped by Satan using the same method. Satan baits the trap with material possessions, success, popularity, physical pleasures, social acceptance, and numberless other “precious treasures” that are so important to us. Then we, like little monkeys, grab and grasp and make tight little fists around our treasure only to discover that we are trapped in an existence of worldliness. God word says that we cannot serve both God and mammon (Matt.6:24). Have you been trapped by Satan’s little traps? Don’t foolishly hold onto your “precious treasure” and be lost eternally! Don’t try to gain the “whole world” and lose your own soul. Release whatever might be keeping you from your God. Don’t be caught like the little monkey! Pray, then read in God’s word what Hs will is for you.    Bro. Eaton

Thursday, November 3, 2011

The Ten Commandments

THE LAW OF MOSES by Bro. Eaton
Many today are confused about the “Law of Moses” or “The Ten Commandments”. Many think that we must adhere to the Ten Commandments as the very basis of ones faith. We need to examine the facts with an open mind allowing God’s word to speak to our hearts.
We begin with the premise that the “Law” and the “Covenant” are the same thing. One will read of the giving of the “Law” in the Old Testament book of Exodus 20:1-17.  After the tablets which were written by the hand of God were destroyed, we read that Moses wrote the words of the “Covenant” and the “Commandments” on tablets of stone. (Exodus 34:27-28) Those “10 Commandments” are called the “Covenant of God” as recorded in Deuteronomy 4:13. The tables of stone are called the “Tables of the Covenant” in Deuteronomy 9:9-11.
Jeremiah wrote of a new covenant with the house of Israel (Jeremiah 31:31-34) which was written on the inward parts and on the heart. Gentiles (all non-Jewish) were without hope being “Strangers” to the “Old Covenant” (Ephesians 2:11-13). To conclude, everyone who was not born into the family as a descendant of Abraham (an Israeli) was a Gentile and not bound to the “Covenant of God” which included all the provisions for worship and life (including the two tablets known as the “Ten Commandments”). You and I would not have been bound to the “Covenant of God” unless we were Jewish! So where do we go from here?
Christ Abolishes the “Law of Commandments.” (Ephesians 2:15) His blood blotted out the “Handwriting of Ordinances” which was against the Gentile. That blotting out included the “Ten Commandments” which were part of the “Covenant of Ordinances.” The “Law of Moses” or “The Covenant” was removed and made no longer binding on anyone. It was removed because it was not perfect as recorded in Hebrews 8:6-13. Under the “Old Covenant” there was a veil between God and man. Only once a year was the high priest allowed into the “Holy of Holies” behind the veil. Only he was allowed in. No other worshipper could enter or they would have been struck dead by the hand of God. Not only that, but, only those of the priesthood could enter the “Holy Place.” The common Jew could only worship afar.  When Christ died on the cross that veil was ripped from top to bottom. There now was nothing separating man from His God. The “Old Covenant” the “Old Testament” was nailed to the cross. It was made void when Christ issued a “New Covenant” a “New Testament” to rule all worshippers.
Please read on and let me explain it in simple words. Most everyone has a will written for the benefit of their family which lists the wishes of the writer. That will or as it is called the “Last Will and Testament” of the deceased. It is in effect from the time it is written until the death of the testator. Some way down the road the will needs to be changed. When a new will is written the old one becomes null and void. The new will takes effect and remains effective until the death of the testator or it is rewritten. You can no longer use the old will at the death of the testator. The only one that is in force is the “Last Will and Testament.” You cannot use the old one, nor any part of it no matter how much you might want to. That was not the will that showed the wishes of the testator. So we conclude that our loved ones must honor the last will as it is probated. This is simple to understand. BUT WAIT!!!! Am I saying we don’t have to keep the Ten Commandments? To make is simple…YES. But do not close your mind yet. Let me continue to explore God’s word concerning the principles God gave us in those Ten Commandments. God is the same today as He was yesterday in all of His principles. He has simply through the death of His Son issued in a perfect “Last Will or Testament” which allows man to go directly before His throne without a priest or an high priest. Christ became our High Priest to intercede for us before His Father. So where do we go now to find the principles of the Ten Commandments. Allow me to paraphrase.
NO OTHER GOD         Old Law Ex. 20:30       New Law Acts 14:15; 1 Cor. 8:5-6
NO IDOLATRY             Old Law Ex. 20:4-5      New Law 1 Jn. 5:21; 1 Cor. 8:4
DO NOT TAKE THE LORD’S NAME IN VAIN
                                    Old Law Ex. 20:7         New Law Jm. 5:12; Mt. 12:36-37
REMEMBER THE SABBATH
                                    Old Law Ex. 20:8         New Law  *Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 16:1-2
HONOR THY FATHER AND MOTHER
                                    Old Law Ex. 20:12       New Law Eph. 6:1
DO NOT KILL               Old Law Ex. 20:13       New Law 1 Pt. 4:15
DO NOT COMMIT ADULTERY
                                    Old Law Ex. 20:14       New Law 1 Cor. 6:9-10
DO NOT STEAL           Old Law Ex. 20:15       New Law Eph. 4:28
DO NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS
                                    Old Law Ex. 20:16       New Law Col. 3:9; Rev. 21:8
DO NOT COVET          Old Law Ex. 20:17       New Law 1 Cor. 6:10; Eph. 5:3
*The day of worship in the New Testament is the “Lord’s Day” or Sunday the first day of the week

The conclusion: We live under the perfect Law of Christ, His Last Will and Testament. We have nothing separating us from God (the veil). The blood of Christ brings forgiveness today, not the blood of bulls and goats which is required under the “Old Law.”  If you keep the “Old Law” you must keep it in it’s entirety including the animal sacrifices. But, no one can do that because that requires a priesthood which can trace it’s linage to Aaron the Hi-priest of that law. That means that no one can worship under the Old Law today. All they can do is to go through cafeteria style and pick what appeals to then which will always include the Ten Commandments.  The New Testament will be the book of judgment for all who have lived after Christ died on the cross. That includes all mankind. Christ and the New Testament writers have presented the same basic principles as listed in the Ten Commandments. The only way to heaven is through Christ by obedience to his will (New Testament). Please don’t try to resurrect the old. Accept the Will of Christ. On the judgment day we will stand before God and be judged by the things written therein. May God bless you in this brief study. Please feel free to leave my any comment along with a contact so we can be of further help to you.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Cohabitation or Marriage

This article was written by Kerby Anderson, Probe - October 26, 2011 and is shown in it's entireity as seen on Point of View's website


Introduction

"Cohabitation is replacing marriage as the first living together experience for young men and women." And those who live together before they get married are putting their future marriage in danger. Those are some of the conclusions by sociologists David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead in their study for the National Marriage Project.

In this article we are going to talk about this social phenomenon of cohabitation. It used to be called "living in sin" or "shacking up." Today, it has been replaced by more neutral terms like "living together" or "cohabitation." For this article, I will use the term cohabitation since it is the generally accepted term in society and law. Cohabitation has been defined as "two unrelated persons of the opposite sex who share common living arrangements in a sexually intimate relationship without legal or religious sanction."

Cohabitation, as a lifestyle, is on the rise. Consider the significant growth in cohabitation rates in the last few decades. In 1960 and 1970, about a half million were living together. But by 1980 that number was 1.5 million. By 1990 the number was nearly three million. And by 2000 the number was almost five million.

Researchers estimate that today as many as 50% of Americans cohabit at one time or another prior to marriage. The stereotype of two young, childless people living together is not completely accurate; currently, some 40% of cohabiting relationships involve children.

America also appears to be changing its attitude toward cohabitation. George Barna has reported that 60% of Americans believed that the best way to establish a successful marriage is to cohabit prior to marriage. Another survey found that two thirds (66%) of high school senior boys agreed or mostly agreed with the statement "it is usually a good idea for a couple to live together before getting married in order to find out whether they really get along."

Cohabitation is not the same as marriage. It is not recognized as marriage by the state. And the participants are living together because it is their intent not to be married, at least for the time being.

Although some people will say that a cohabiting couple is "married in the eyes of God," that is not true. They are not married in God's eyes because they are living contrary to biblical statements about marriage. And they are not married in their own eyes because they have specifically decided not to marry.

Cohabitation is without a doubt changing the cultural landscape of our society. The proportion of first marriages preceded by cohabitation has increased ten-fold in the last few decades. And the increasing number of cohabiting couples sends a mixed message to our children. On the one hand, they hear parents and pastors proclaim the value of marriage. But on the other hand, they see a culture condoning cohabitation.


Cohabitation and Test-drive Relationships

"I think we should live together before we get married to see if we are compatible."

How many times have we heard that line? But many of the current assumptions about living together are incorrect.

Linda Waite and Maggie Gallagher wrote The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier and Better Off Financially. It not only makes the case for marriage, it also challenges contemporary assumptions about cohabitation.

The thesis of the book is simple. Back in the 1950s, the rules were clear: first love, next marriage, and only then the baby carriage. But the social "tsunami" of the 1960s that struck changed everything. The Pill, the sexual revolution, gay pride, feminism, mothers in the workplace, no-fault divorce, and the rise of illegitimate births changed our views of marriage and family. The authors marshal the evidence to show that marriage is a good thing. As the subtitle says, married people are happier, healthier and better off financially.

Nevertheless, the conventional wisdom is that you should "try before you buy." In fact, one of the oft-repeated questions justifying living together is: "You wouldn't buy a car without a test drive would you?" The problem with such questions and slogans is they dehumanize the other person. If I decide not to buy a car (or a pair of shoes or whatever the inanimate object), the car doesn't feel rejected. When you test-drive your car, you don't pack your personal luggage in the trunk. And rejecting a car model doesn't bring emotional baggage into the next test-driving experience. The car doesn't need psychological counseling so that it can trust the next car buyer. Frankly, test-driving a relationship is only positive if you are the driver.

Research has shown that those who cohabit tend to view marriage negatively because it involved the assumption of new responsibilities that contrasted with their former freedoms. On the other hand, those marrying through the conventional route of dating and courtship did not feel constrained by marriage, but liberated by marriage.

Consider the contrast. A couple living together has nearly everything marriage has to offer (including sex) but few commitments or responsibilities. So, cohabiting people feel trapped when they enter marriage. They must assume huge new responsibilities while getting nothing they didn't already have.

Couples entering marriage through dating and courtship experience just the opposite, especially if they maintain their sexual purity. Marriage is the culmination of their relationship and provides the full depth of a relationship they have long anticipated.

This is not to say that cohabitation guarantees marital failure nor that marriage through the conventional route guarantees marital success. There are exceptions to this rule, but a couple who live together before marriage stack the odds against themselves and their future marriage.


Cohabitation and Perceptions

If you live together before you get married, you're putting your future marriage in danger. That's the conclusion of a recent report on cohabitation. America's five million cohabiting couples live together to save money, to test-run a marriage, or to stave off loneliness. But the practice can cause significant harm to a marriage.

Sociologists David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead released their study through the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University. Their study confirms earlier studies about the danger of cohabiting, and adds additional detail.

They found that cohabiting appears to be so counterproductive to long-lasting marriage that unmarried couples should avoid living together, especially if it involves children. They argue that living together is "a fragile family form" that poses increased risk to women and children.

Part of the reason for the danger is the difference in perception. Men often enter the relationship with less intention to marry than do women. They may regard it more as a sexual opportunity without the ties of long-term commitment. Women, however, often see the living arrangement as a step toward eventual marriage. So while the women may believe they are headed for marriage, the man has other ideas. Some men actually resent the women they live with and view them as easy. Such a woman is not his idea of a faithful marriage partner.

People who live together in uncommitted relationships may be unwilling to work out problems. Since there is no long-term commitment, often it is easy to leave the current living arrangement and seek less fractious relationships with a new partner.

The ten-fold increase in cohabitation in the last few decades is staggering. The reasons for the growth are many: fewer taboos against premarital sex, earlier sexual maturity, later marriage, adequate income to live apart from their families.

Whatever the reasons for cohabiting, this study documents the dangers. Couples who live together are more likely to divorce than those who don't. They are less happy and score lower on well-being indices, including sexual satisfaction. And cohabiting couples are often poorer than married couples.

Even if millions are doing it, living together is a bad idea. As we will see later, there are clear biblical prohibitions against premarital sex. But apart from these biblical pronouncements are the ominous sociological predictions of failure when a couple considers cohabitation rather than marriage. The latest research backs up what the Bible has said for millennia. If you want a good marriage, don't do what society says. Do what the Bible teaches us to do.


Consequences of Cohabitation

Contrary to conventional wisdom, cohabitation can be harmful to marriage as well as to the couples and their children. One study based on the National Survey of Families and Households found that marriages which had prior cohabitors were 46% more likely to divorce than marriages of noncohabitors. The authors concluded from this study and from a review of previous studies that the risk of marital disruption following cohabitation "is beginning to take on the status of an empirical generalization."

Some have tried to argue that the correlation between cohabitation and divorce is artificial since people willing to cohabit are more unconventional and less committed to marriage. In other words, cohabitation doesn't cause divorce but is merely associated with it because the same type of people are involved in both phenomena. Yet, even when this "selection effect" is carefully controlled statistically, a "cohabitation effect" remains.

Marriages are held together by a common commitment which is absent in most, if not all, cohabiting relationships. Partners who live together value autonomy over commitment and tend not to be as committed as married couples in their dedication to the continuation of the relationship.

One study found that "living with a romantic partner prior to marriage was associated with more negative and less positive problem solving support and behavior during marriage." The reason is simple. Since there is less certainty of a long-term commitment, "there may be less motivation for cohabiting partners to develop their conflict resolution and support skills."

Couples living together, however, miss out on more than just the benefits of marriage. Annual rates of depression among cohabiting couples are more than three times higher than they are among married couples. Those who cohabit are much more likely to be unhappy in marriage and much more likely to think about divorce.

Women in cohabiting relationships are more than twice as likely than married women to suffer physical and sexual abuse. Another study found that women in cohabiting relationships are nine times more likely to be killed by their partner than are women in marital relationships.

Cohabitation is especially harmful to children. First, several studies have found that children currently living with a mother and her unmarried partner have significantly more behavior problems and lower academic performance than children in intact families. Second, there is the risk that the couple will break up creating even more social and personal difficulties. Third, many of these children were not born in the present union but in a previous union of one of the adult partners (usually the mother). Living in a house with a mother and an unmarried boyfriend is tenuous at best. Legal claims to child support and other sources of family income are absent.


Cohabitation and the Bible

So far, we have been talking about the social and psychological consequences of cohabitation. Let's turn now to a biblical perspective.

The Bible teaches that the act of sexual intercourse can have a strong bonding effect on two people. When done within the bounds of marriage, the man and the woman become one flesh (Eph. 5:31). But sexual intercourse outside of marriage also has consequences. Writing to the church in Corinth, the Apostle Paul said that when a man joins himself to a prostitute, he becomes one body with her (1 Cor. 6:16).

The context of the discussion arose from a problem within the church. A man in the church was having sexual relations with his father's wife (1 Cor. 5:1-3). Paul calls this relationship sinful. First, it was incestuous, which was condemned by the Old Testament (Lev. 18:8, Deut. 22:30). Second, there was no marital union, but instead an example of cohabitation. Paul's admonition to us is to flee sexual immorality (1 Cor. 6:18).

Sexual immorality is condemned in about 25 passages in the New Testament. The Greek word is porneia, a word which includes all forms of illicit sexual intercourse. Jesus taught, "For from within, out of men's hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. All these evils come from inside and make a man 'unclean'" (Mark 7:21-23).

Paul said, "It is God's will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality; that each of you should learn to control his own body in a way that is holy and honorable, not in passionate lust like the heathen, who do not know God" (1 Thess. 4:3-5).

Marriage is God's plan. Marriage provides intimate companionship for life (Gen. 2:18). It provides a context for the procreation and nurture of children (Eph. 6:1-2). And finally, marriage provides a godly outlet for sexual desire (1 Cor. 7:2).

In the New Testament, believers are warned against persistent sin, including sexual sin (1 Cor. 5:1-5). The church is to keep believers accountable for their behavior. Believers are to judge themselves, lest they fall into God's hands (1 Cor 11:31-32). Sexual sin should not even be named among believers (Eph. 5:3).

Living together outside of marriage not only violates biblical commands but it puts a couple and their future marriage at risk. In this article, I have collected a number of sobering statistics about the impact cohabitation can have on you and your relationship. If you want a good marriage, don't do what society says, do what the Bible teaches us to do.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Who do you trust?

Who Do You Trust?
In whom or what do you put your trust?  First thing is to establish what and who is to be your standard by which you gauge all of your decisions. That source must be impeccable found to be accurate, reliable, unchanging, proven and true. Thus you must trust no one or nothing unless it passes the test of your standard. Could one chose to trust in someone you admire greatly? Or perhaps in something you have read? The answer again is, “Does that individual agree with the standard you have chosen for comparison or does the article or the source meet the standard?”  So where does one begin? Begin with yourself. Use the gift that God has given you…the ability to reason and think things through. Choose your standard with care. Check it out. Do diligent research and investigation as to how impeccable, accurate, reliable, unchanging, proven and true it is. Take no ones word until you have checked it out from your own reasoning. Do not be duped into just being open to excepting everything nor closed minded into excepting nothing.
Let’s begin with selecting our standard. Seems like I am suggesting the impossible because no one is perfect, nothing found without error by which we can use as a standard. Oh! But there is! There was one found perfect that can be used as a standard by which we can examine all others. There is written a source which is without error which will be a source of everything we which to examine. That standard is JESUS CHRIST and the HOLY BIBLE which is the roadmap for all men. Please don’t take my word for it! Check it out for yourself. Jesus was without sin, without fault and is the only standard which can be used for examining all others regardless of what ever you or I may think about them. The Bible is “inspired” and has never been found with errors. No other book can state that and have never nor will ever stand up under the same scrutiny and close examination as has the Bible. It is the only source which can be used as a standard to examine others by. Check it out yourself. Never take anyone’s word with your doing your own research and soul searching. Do so with an open mind and use reason and you will come to the same conclusion. Challenge yourself and pray that God will allow you to see the truth.
Now that one has established a standard by which to gauge all issues and individuals it is time to really begin to evaluate what one believes and why. Do I believe a particular thing because that’s what my parents wanted me to believe? Is it because of what I was taught in school? Is it because that is what my friends believe? Is it because I am just to plain lazy to think for my self? Has someone I look up to believed it that way? Is it because what I have read? If so, who wrote it and does it agree with my standard or is it in contradiction? Or is what I believe because it has passed the test of my standard? I hope we all will begin to look at everything and everyone and what they say and represent based on passing it through your standard. If it is in agreement…then I can embrace it…if not I must reject it a false. If the individual is in agreement with JESUS and his teaching then I can trust that individual…if not then I must not be found contributing to that individual’s teachings or actions. One can be known by the company he keeps. Love the individual and pray that they will turn from error but never accept their ways. Remember this is not judging but simply trying to keep yourself from evil and the appearance of evil. To stand for what God has declared to be right and to appose what He has deemed evil and wrong is not always easy, but it is right. We need to be careful not to lend ourselves to that which is wrong or even appears to be wrong. Standing for what is right is all that matters. Today it is just easier to go along in order to get along. Times are hard. Times are harder today than ever in our country’s history. They are going to get harder I believe because man has strayed so far from God! Doing what is right is to be found in the minority. Will you pass the test? What and in whom do you trust? When it really gets tough with whom will you stand? Who will you trust? Boo Hoo! I got it soooo hard. What about those whom endured not only physical but also mental torture throughout the early Christian era? It’s not how bad it is or how bad it will get, but it is how will I react? What will I find as to my correct response as found in my standard? Do I feel all alone…or do I feel that between myself and God “all things are possible.”
Now, how do I begin using my new knowledge? When I must decide where I stand on issues who or what do I trust? When issues of abortion, homosexuality, drugs, death, money issues, divorce, drunkenness, lewdness, premarital sex, witchcraft, racism, discrimination, health, language, protesting, charity, government controls, gun control, capital punishment, discipline, love, anger, health, marriage, lying, cheating, stealing or any other issue…Where do I stand?...What do I believe?...How do I defend my beliefs?
Remember, TRUST NO ONE, TRUST NOTHING that does not pass the litmus test based on your choice of standards. Do not lend yourself or your name to anything or anyone that failed your standards test. In the end I hope that you will trust God, His Word and Jesus Christ. As for my and my household…”We will serve the Lord.” I hope this brief article will cause you to think, to reason, to pray that you will trust only that which can be proven to be accurate and will pass the test of your standard. Do your own research. Don’t take my word for it! Find the truth for yourself. I am confident that when you search your heart you will conclude the same thing I have concluded. May God bless you even as you read this article?   Bro. Eaton

Saturday, September 3, 2011

How Old Is The Earth?

Explain why the Earth appears to be so very old?
This is the doctrine of apparent age.
How old was Adam 2 seconds after God created him? (2 seconds literally) How old does he appeared to be?  Old enough to reproduce a full grown mature adult, not an infant.  The same is true of Eve. The same is true of plants and animals.
At the completion of creation God said “it was very good”, the best that it could be, complete, mature.”
First Corinthians 14 states that God is the God of order not disorder so it was with his creation, fully complete, ready to begin God’s work.  This doctrine is very consistent throughout old and new Testaments.
Science measures the age of Earth through evolutionary process. Uniformitarianism states that the present is the key to the past.  Present processes have always gone on in the past as they do today. This rates cannot take into account the apparent age or the global flood.
In the early 60s and island off of Greenland and Iceland there was being formed later called “Surtsey”. The head of the Iceland’s geo logical team after two years of formation set foot on the new Island. Upon arrival he said “If I had not seen it with my own eyes information you could not have convinced me that this island was only two years old”. “It had already begun to sprout trees and older growth. My scientific measurement it showed to be millions of years old when in reality had been formed from volcanic rock in only two years.”     Dr. Andrews
How do creationists deal with dinosaurs?
Scientists tell us they lived some 160-170 million years ago and for some unexplained reason just disappeared. We cannot deny their existence! The question is not did they exist,  but when that they exist? Return to book of Exodus 20 chapter verse 11 “In six days at Jehovah made the earth and the heavens and the seas and all that in them is and on the seventh day he rested.”
If God created all that are on earth and seas and heavens what has God left out? The answer is nothing. All animals were created on days five and six. That is a literal 24 hour periods. Moses said of creation it is finished in Genesis 1 verse 31.
Dinosaurs and man were contemporaries. They walked together on earth. Job 40 verses 15 to 24 God begins questioning Job as to the consideration of the Behemoth that he had made. What  is a behemoth? Is a hippo? No for he had still like a cedar tree. Is an elephant? No for the very same reason. What was it then? It has to be a dinosaur.  Yes
Dr. Hubbard an archaeologists went to Arizona to excavate a canyon not too many years ago. He found the wall drawings of Indians which showed cattle, sheep, dinosaurs, Buffalo, and oxen. He made the following comment: “Taken all in all, the proportions are good. The huge reptile is depicted in that attitude in which men would most likely see it,  reared up on his hind legs balancing on a longtail either feeding or in their fighting position possibly defending itself against the party of men.”
Dr. Ingalls and evolutionist and archaeologist was doing some work in Kentucky and the surrounding states. He found a human like foot prints in coal veins.  Coal is from the Carboniferous Period separated by scientific data some 242 250. million years from man.  He found the same kind of footprints in the mountains of West Virginia, Virginian and the Rocky Mountains. He made the following comments:” The tracks are information is considered to be an upper  Carboniferous (215 million year old) and shows five toes and an arch which is unquestionably human. The tracks are 9 ½ inches long 4 ½ inches broad at the heel. The width of the forwardend of  the track by the toes was 6 inches. The being that left the tracks was biped and walked upright as a human.”  “If man or even his ancestors,  or even the ape ancestors’ early mammal ancestors existed as far back in the Carboniferous Period, in any shape then the whole existence of geology is so completely wrong that all geologists will resign their jobs and take up truck driving. Hence for the present at least science rejects the attractive explanation that man made this mysterious footprints in the mud of the Carboniferous Period.”
This is not good science and it is not objective.
Of Dr. Hubbard’s excavation findings: “Another highly important feature of Dr. Hubbard’s report is the discovery of fossil footprints of both three toed  carnivorous dinosaurs and the Imperial elephants at the same locality. It is as it appears both of these creatures left their footprints in the river sand or mud approximately the same. Then we must assume that the dinosaurs continued to survive for millions of years later than scientists would have us to believe or else that the Imperial elephants appeared on earth millions of years before they were supposed to have arrived. But it seems highly preposterous and entirely contrary to all laws of evolution to assume that these highly developed pachyderms were inhabiting the earth long ages before more primitive types of animals.”  Dr. Veerrill
In June of 1968 Mr. Mister of Utah had a number of trilobytes in his collection. He in a number of friends went to Antelope Springs today for more trilobytes  to add to his collection. Climbing some 200 feet up a ledge – he discovered trilobytes in this cambium strata well over 400 million years old (by scientific dating) embedded in the human footprint. Man and kilobytes coexisting? Yes
Scientific measurements simply are not accurate.
Were then did all the dinosaurs go? Science cannot answer accurately this question. One thing we know for sure God created them,  He also preserve them on the Ark of Noah during the flood. What happened after the flood is only conjecture of theory.
The above article is from a series of lessons on Christian Evidences as taught by Bro. Eaton and are taken from his notes from classes taught by Bert Thompson a renounded scientist and author for the Apologtics Christian Press.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Do you feel like a doormat?

Are Christians supposed to live their lives as doormats?
1 Peter 2:18-24, doormats? [1]

A reader and I have been both struggling with the issue of injustice and abuse. It’s an extremely complex issue and you don’t read or listen long before you hear phrases like, "But on the other hand" or "But I don’t mean by that". I suppose we talk about the matter to keep from saying nothing or because someone in their pain and bewilderment asks us what we think.

How much should a Christian take? Are there no limits? Does "turn the other cheek" (see Matthew 5:38-44) mean we’re supposed to see ourselves as doormats and act accordingly? That tough passage in 1 Peter 2:18-24 seems easy enough to understand until somebody starts sticking it to you. When that happens we don’t say it isn’t the word of God, but we’re inclined to read all the different versions and commentaries to make sure it means what it looks like it says.

It makes for a hard life if you’re daily suffering injustice and being abused and someone says to you, "God called you to this so take it patiently." See 1 Peter 2:20-21. It makes for a hard life if someone abuses you in this way and you’re told to offer yourself as the object of abuse in another way (compare Matthew 5:38-44).

We can’t function in life without generalisations but we’re idiots if we’re not fully prepared to accept that there are many exceptions to our generalisations. Bearing that in mind, I tend to think that Western Christians—generally speaking—whinge too much and want too much and expect too much. Setting aside—as hardly worth even talking about seriously—the sinful and sickening lunacy of the "prosperity gospel" preachers I think it’s true "in general" that when Western Christians ask for "more" that something is badly out of whack.

Nevertheless I personally know people—lots of people—and you do too, that go through daily purgatory. It’s bad enough that the emotional or physical abuse is severe and painful and enduring, what makes it worse is their uncertainty about how they should to respond to it. Are they supposed to just take it?

My impression is that it’s only the very sensitive believers that go on enduring daily and marked injustice. Those less devoted to God (I’m guessing) will quickly walk away from the situation "no matter what the Bible says." That makes sense at one level; "don’t delve into scriptures to see what they say, if it gets where you think it’s too much just walk away and don’t look back!"

Sounds like good advice. Sounds like the kind of advice that society at large operates on (compare marriage vows). But it leaves untouched the kind of texts cited above. What are we to make of them? Should we go through the scriptures and take what pleases us and dismiss the rest? Can sensitive Christians consciously do that kind of thing?

That’s the major problem with the advice but there’s also the question, what’s "too much"? For some of us it would appear that even a criticism is "too much". And you hear of marriages foundering because "my emotional needs were not being met" or "I have a right to be happy and he/she wasn’t making me happy." It seems clear that there are people whose every other sentence is something like, "Damn ‘community’ what about my rights?" Friendships collapse because the expected "gush" of gratitude wasn’t always forthcoming. That kind of thing, while others have the skin stripped from their bones by a merciless tongue day after day. That kind of peevishness about minor dissatisfactions, while others are deliberately and consistently mistreated and/or physically abused by those who swore to provide the reverse. I think it’s fairly easy for us to spot what we would call the "extremes" but it’s that broad area in between that’s hard to define—isn’t it? Even the sufferer has a hard time convincing him or herself about the meaning of "too much". The definition of that would depend in part on the nature and make-up of the sufferer so those that are on the "outside" offering advice need to be confident that they have a good grasp of the situation.

But what about those texts—the kind we mentioned earlier? Do those not deal with extreme situations and still they call the sufferer to stay and endure as part of his or her life for Christ? I don’t think it’s that simple.


I think we should make a distinction between what we can’t alter and what we’re at liberty to alter.

Take the case of the slaves in 1 Peter 2:18-24. That’s not a text about "employees" who can change their jobs if they aren’t satisfied with the boss or the prevailing conditions, so we mustn’t use it as if it were. We can’t tell employees that 1 Peter 2 teaches that they can’t change jobs but that they must endure the injustice and abuse heaped on them by the bosses. The text isn’t dealing with a relationship shaped and sustained by mutual commitment so we mustn’t use it as if it were. Peter isn’t writing to people that have been rescued from an oppressive society that owned slaves the way people own shoes so we mustn’t use the text as if it were.

Peter speaks to people as they find themselves, in a situation they can’t change and calls them to live out their lives in that situation as people that belong to Christ. The passage says nothing about the evil of the "slavery system" but as sure as God made little green apples the gospel of Christ is the death of all such tyrannous arrangements. The passage works within the existing circumstances and doesn’t forbid a free man or woman appealing to the proper authorities about injustice (compare Paul’s appeal to Caesar—see Acts 25:10-12).

I would say if a Christian can change an oppressive situation that he or she has the right to do so. How that change might be effected depends a lot on the situation. And I’d say that given the right set of circumstances that a Christian would have the responsibility as well as the right to work to change the situation. The oppressor might need something more than another cheek turned to him. In a case such as that, the sufferer is no "doormat". To rebuke oppression and protest against it is no crime—we learn that from Christ and some overturned tables. It’s true that in that temple incident Jesus was standing for someone other than himself but injustice is injustice! And if it turns out that the one that needs the cup of cold water is oneself the need is still real.

Of course it’s perfectly acceptable from someone who has the power to escape injustice to choose to forfeit his or her right to do it. Christ could have called for divine aid and put a stop to the injustice being heaped on him but refused to do it because the will of the Father was better served by his self-denial. And don’t we all know people who, for reasons best known to and understood by themselves, refuse to walk away from an oppressive relationship?

Relationships are rarely simple and for the sake of others or with certain goals in mind, or moved by commitments made, those that are being hurt choose to remain. When you choose to remain the "doormat" notion vanishes. If you choose to endure abuse to gain something more precious to you than an abuse-free existence it doesn’t matter how it appears to others.


I’ve told (page 149) of C.S Rodd’s rehearsal in The Expository Times of a wife who’d run off every so often and live for extended periods with some man and then come back. The husband received her back every time it happened. A friend tried to bring it up to the husband but he whispered with intensity, "Not a word! She’s my wife." She came back after her final absence, sick, and wouldn’t get better. The husband gently nursed her until the day she died in his patient arms. Rodd mentioned this in a sermon and on his way out of the building a psychologist said to Rodd that "the psychological problems of the husband need to be looked at."

Maybe, maybe not. Had the husband been firmer would the wife have lived differently? Should he have given her an ultimatum? God knows! But I find it interesting that a family counsellor who knew no more about the situation than you or I do, was willing to conclude that the husband was a disturbed man.

The one who gladly paid the awful price needed therapy?

The above article was written by Jim McGuiggan a beloved brother and one of my instructors at the preaching school in Lubbock, Texas. It has been copied and posted with permission.

Jim McGuiggan was born in Belfast, Northern Ireland.  McGuiggan has studied and taught the Bible in America at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Since he has returned to Ireland,where he has worked with a congregation of God's people outside of Belfast. Jim is the author of numerous books, including The God of the Towel and Jesus: Hero of My Soul, both Gold Medallion finalists.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

What is my sole purpose in life?

"The Whole Duty of Man "
Eccl. 12:13
"13Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter; Fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole duty of man. 14For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil."

The book of Ecclesiastes is too often treated as either a depressing litany of the futilities of life, or a simplistic series of homilies, warning people to avoid things in life that might seem good, because they are really bad ("vain"). The great, triumphant, enlightening truth of Ecclesiastes is treated rather as the only slim ray of hope that can be grasped by the desperate reader.

Ecclesiastes is much different and much more than that. It is the only book of pure philosophy in the Bible. It's the only one needed, because it considers, however briefly, the entire human condition, and provides the answer, thus rendering further speculations somewhat unnecessary.

Part of the dark and simple view of Ecclesiastes comes from our own cultural background as American religious folk, firmly rooted in Puritan ideals. The Puritan view of Ecclesiastes matches well with the common view now - all the enjoyable physical things of this life are bad, and a waste of time, and thus should be avoided.

Part of this may also stem from a conscious or sub-conscious analysis of the "life" of Christ. After all, we don't read about Jesus taking a lot of time to "stop and smell the roses," and so that makes it somehow wrong for us to do so. But this ignores the fact that we have a record of just under 10% of His life. Before His baptism by John, we don't really know how He spent His time. We can certainly presume that He spent appropriate amounts of time doing God's will, supporting himself, and other necessities. But we cannot assume that just because He didn't spend much time on pleasure during His ministry that He never did. Once His ministry began, He only had 3 years to change the world. No entrepreneur, when starting a new and ambitious venture, has much time for anything else for the first 3 years. That can hardly be considered conclusive proof that he doesn't ever do anything just for fun. Nor does it with Jesus.

People have misunderstood Solomon's (and yes, Solomon definitely wrote Ecclesiastes) words, repeated throughout the book, to the effect that "All is vanity". In the same way that people attach invalid and inappropriate feelings and assumptions to the unfortunate translation of `talents' in the "Parable of the Talents", so also people incorrectly assume that the meaning of `vanity' in Ecclesiastes has the same negative connotation with which we associate the term `vain' ("she's so vain") today.

This is incorrect, and leads to a false sense of both the word itself, as well as the major premise which it reveals in Ecclesiastes. The use of the term is descriptive, but not pejorative. It is an adjective, not a moral judgment. The idea of `vanity' in Ecclesiastes is that of ephemerality, fleetingness, undependability, fickleness, unpredictable in duration. These things that are "vanity" are not inherently bad; they are inherently transitive. They are passing away. They will fail to provide a permanent basis for happiness, contentment, fulfillment, purpose, or satisfaction in life.

They can and do give temporary pleasure, and these are not bad things to enjoy. In fact, Ecclesiastes encourages people to find pleasure in the blessings of life (which we should know are from God). But they do not, and cannot, ultimately fulfill or satisfy.
Most of humanity spends its life in pursuit of things that they believe will fill the void, the hunger, the nagging sense of emptiness, and the longing for purpose in their lives. Since most people cannot have anything approaching the sum of their desires, it is easy and tempting, and very nearly universally done, to assume that the key to happiness and contentment must lie in the possession of one of those other things that we don't have (since obviously, the stuff we already have isn't getting it done).

But Solomon was perhaps uniquely positioned to try it out for us. And he did, as he says in the book. He gave his heart whatever it desired, to see if it would bring him happiness. Each failed, and he reports to us faithfully the result of each of his experiments, spanning the range of human endeavors and pleasures. Finally, after failing to find complete satisfaction in anything else he had tried, he reveals to us that the only true answer is to serve God.
Let us examine each of the areas in which Solomon searched for the answer before concluding that God was the only one.

I. Learning (1:13-18)
II. Pleasure (Wine and mirth) (2:1-3)
III. Great accomplishments ("A legacy of achievement") (2:4-17)
IV. Hard work and financial reward ("A successful career") (2:18-23, 4:4-12, 6:7-8)
V. Popularity and Fame (4:13-16)
VI. Wealth (5:8-6:2)
VII. Family (6:3-6)
VIII. Anticipation of the Future ("A dreamer") (6:9-12)

The second half of the book begins giving answers. After exhausting all the available avenues of pleasure or fulfillment available on this earth, Solomon begins the second half of the book by explaining such things on the earth as can bring some peace into life. While not ends in themselves, and while not the ultimate goal or purpose of existence, his advice throughout most of the rest of the book is practical and true, and tends to help greatly in leading a contented life.
  1. Wisdom and folly contrasted in a variety of ways (7:1-14)
  2. Moderation in all things (7:15-18)
  3. Don't set yourself up to resist authority (8:1-9)
  4. Accept that there are things we will not understand or know (8:10-17)
  5. All men come to the same end (death) (9:1-6)
  6. Enjoy the good things in life. Live it to its fullest. (9:7-12)
  7. Seek wisdom for its own sake, not for glory. (9:13-18)
  8. Be liberal in business (11:1-6)
  9. Enjoy your youth while you are young (11:7-10)
  10. Don't waste opportunities to serve God (12:1-8)
Finally, the conclusion of the whole matter, which is really quite simple:

"13Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter; Fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole duty of man. 14For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil."

So what's depressing? Only if you wanted deeply to find fulfillment in physical things should this conclusion make you sad. In fact, we should actually feel relieved when we read Ecclesiastes. It should be a joyful thing to us. If happiness could only be found in completely indulging all of our heart's desires on this earth, how many of us could ever hope to be truly happy? Which of us can do what Solomon was able to, and indulge every one of his whims?
But what Ecclesiastes tells us in the end is that anyone can find fulfillment and satisfaction in life. That's because anyone can choose to serve God. And if we understand and choose to accept and embrace our purpose and our duty on this earth, we will find the contentment and peace that continues to elude the world, and that eluded even Solomon during his search among earthly things.

Why is there so much suffering in the world today?

Human Suffering

Introduction:
There can be no real question as to whether there is any purpose in human suffering. There is no question that suffering exists. Even the atheists can find purpose for suffering, but such purpose is that which man infuses into his misery.
The problem comes when we think of ourselves as God's creatures. Then we ask, "In a world made by a loving God, why does suffering exist?"

Man, A part of the universe:
When God created the universe, He chose to ordain principles of operation which we usually call laws of nature. The effort to understand human suffering must begin by considering man's place in the natural order of things.
At first, man lived in a perfect realm where he could eat of the fruit of the Tree of Life and live indefinitely (Gen. 3:22; cf. 2:9). Because of the entrance of sin, paradise was ended and the universe no longer operated as it had. It was subjected to vanity (Rom. 8:20). Therefore, although most of the time, the laws of nature are beneficial to each individual, occasionally those same laws can cause great distress to man.
We are unique among the creatures of earth in that man is the only one who can deliberately, knowingly, place himself in harmony or out of harmony with nature. The fact that he is an intelligent being, a free moral agent, makes man different in his relationship to nature from all other creatures. Let us look at some illustrations.

Why does an apple fall from a tree? Let us be specific. Imagine that we are standing before a big apple tree. We see the dark, rough bark of the tree. The yellow-green apples are hanging profusely from the limbs. The wind stirs and moves a limb. Suddenly an apple snaps its moorings and falls to the earth with a little thud.
Now, did God make that particular apple fall? The answer depends on what you mean. If you mean, did God reach down from heaven and snap the apple's stem, no, God did not make it fall. Yet, in the sense that God made the universe and the laws governing the growth of fruit and the chemical process by which the apple is made to fall, plus the law of gravity, yes, God made it fall -- but only indirectly.

Now picture the Golden Gate bridge. High above us stands one of the tall towers from which the bridge is suspended. A tiny speck is standing on the top of the tower. A glance through binoculars reveals that it is a man. Suddenly, with a gasp, we realize the man has jumped. Horrified, we watch as, for several seconds, he falls, slowly turning until he crashes into the waters of the bay.
Did God cause that man to fall and die? If you mean, did God shove him off with an omnipotent finger, no. Here, however, the analogy between the falling apple and the falling man breaks down. God is not responsible for the death of the man, even indirectly, though He did make the law of gravity. The parallel breaks down because the apple could not choose to fall. The man could. He man chose to jump. It is not God's fault. It is the man's.

This incident was one in which the man chose to destroy himself. What about situations where one does not so choose? Let us illustrate again.

One of the laws of nature is inertia. A body in motion tends to retain its motion until contact with a restraining force causes it to stop.
Imagine a blue car with a driver and a passenger. They are moving at fifty-five miles an hour. A car pulls out in front of them, and the blue car plows into its rear. The blue car stops, but the occupants of the car continue to travel at fifty-five miles per hour. In a fraction of a second, they are violently lifted from their seats, and the passenger is rammed through the windshield head-first. The windshields disintegrates, and the passenger's whole body goes out through the opening and careens from the still twisting car ahead and flops over onto the roadside. He is dead.
Did God cause that wreck? Why would God want to cause it? Did God put the streaks of burned rubber down the highway? No, the driver did that trying to stop. Maybe we ought to argue that God was trying to stop the car. Did God smash the car? No, they were smashed because of human mistakes and because of the laws of inertia.

Then maybe God is responsible because He made the laws of inertia. Remember the apple that fell? God made the laws so that the apple fell. Thus He made the apple fall.
Wait just a minute, though. First, remember that we said that indirectly God made the apple fall. Secondly, if someone had taken a stick and had shaken the branch so that the apple fell, then he would be the one who made it fall.
In other words, man is an intelligent being who chooses to utilize the laws of nature. Sometimes, he miscalculates. Then, he pays for it. Miscalculating in shaking an apple from a tree might cause one to fall on your head. Miscalculating in driving a car could easily cost your life. In either case, it is not God's fault.
It is not a sin to get out of harmony with the laws of nature unless one does so deliberately to injure or kill himself or another. The people in the wreck did not choose to have a wreck. They did not sin in having a wreck, but they did violate the laws of nature, and they paid the price.

Why did God made the laws of inertia that could cause people to die in wrecks? Why does the circulation of the air in the atmosphere sometimes result in tornadoes? As we said in the beginning, it is because we do not live in paradise. Since Adam and Eve would have lived indefinitely in the Garden of Eden if they had not sinned, God must have planned for the laws of nature to work in a totally non-destructive manner. With sin, however, came the thorns, the tornadoes, cancer, and the many other things men have learned to dread so badly.
Even now, we are far better off with these laws than we would be without them. Let us take the laws of inertia as an example again. Would you prefer living in daylight constantly with the other side of the planet in perpetual darkness? If inertia of motion did not keep the earth spinning, that is what would happen. Life would cease very quickly under such conditions. Would you prefer having winter all the time? That is what would happen if inertia did not keep us moving around the sun. Even worse, if our movement about the sun stopped, the earth would be drawn into a fiery death.

Most of the time, therefore, when someone dies in an accidental or catastrophic way, it is because they or someone else violated a law of nature. It is certainly not a visitation of God's wrath.
In the Bible one can easily tell when one died from natural causes and when God directly caused it. Most Biblical characters died naturally. Some, like Er (Gen. 38:7), Korah, Dathan, and Abiram (Num. 16:31-35), and Nadab and Abihu (Lev. 10:1-2), were actually slain by God. Moses plainly distinguished between "the common death of all men" and the Lord making "a new thing" (Num. 16:29-30).

It is appointed unto men to die:
It is God's will that all men eventually die, but He does not single out each individual for personal attention. In this world there are diseases, forces that can snuff out life, and the inevitable corruption and decay that are all woven into the warp and woof of life. Eventually, each one of us is going to fall victim to one of these things. By being careful, we may avoid some accidents. But even if we escape accidental death, or serious disease, one day our heart will fail, or some other vital organ will fail, and we will die. It is appointed to man once to die, and after this cometh judgment (Heb. 9:27). Whether death comes soon or late, when it comes, man meets only his inevitable future. The only exceptions will be those who are alive when Christ returns.

Why death?
A question then comes to mind -- why did God appoint that man should die? It is because man was offered endless life and he forfeited it through sin. Adam and Eve demonstrated the course of humanity. Each of us does what they did. We were born innocent; and we sinned (Rom. 3:23).
God made plans for the redemption of mankind even before Adam and Eve sinned, because He foreknew they would sin (2 Tim. 1:9). Yet how could God redeem man and forgive him without making it seem that forgiveness was cheap and sin of no consequence? God's answer was to set a price for forgiveness. That price was life, the life of Jesus Christ.
Think, however, if no one had ever died before Jesus, what would death have meant? Life was made valuable by death. Just as I prize life because I know it will end in death, so I can know a little of the price Jesus paid when He died for me. It is a price each individual who has ever lived can appreciate, no matter what his social standing or his geographical location may be.

Death is also an ever-present reminder to us of the corruptibility fo man. An awareness of death makes us keep an ear turned toward heaven. It keeps us from getting too attached to this world from which we soon shall leave. We must remind ourselves that death is not, as we view it, the end, a closed door. In reality, it is a passageway from one existence to another.

God does not look at death as we do. To God, death is not the worst thing that can happen. The worst thing is to be separated from Him. Physical death is a flippant subject compared to sin and eternal death. Sin and spiritual death are the most important things to avoid. If a person is saved, it matters little if he dies. Sooner or later he must. There is shock, sorrow, and dismay to those left behind -- and then life goes on. If that person is saved, he has entered a life of never-ending bliss. Therefore, mourn not for the dead, but for the spiritually dead.

Sources of suffering:
Does suffering come from God? Again, the Bible does not show God to the be the one who causes our problems. Satan is our adversary. The Bible tells us specifically that the devil caused the suffering Job experienced. Job, like many people today, thought God was responsible for his problems and was dismayed when God confronted him (Job 38-42).
We have already indicated that we may bring suffering upon ourselves by running afoul of the laws of nature -- deliberately or inadvertently. There is also a certain amount of suffering built into the process of growing old and in approaching death. This suffering is not because someone has been wicked or because God is mean. It is just because it is appointed unto man to die (Heb. 9:27).
Instead of thinking of God's manipulating all the influences and forces of life so as to make us suffer, we should realize that our suffering is caused by chance combinations of various forces and factors of life. Now, it is true that God allows these things to occur, but He does not cause each particular episode of suffering to happen.
In most suffering, there is no inherent cause. Most of it is a matter of chance. The Bible teaches that there is such a thing as chance. The writer of Ecclesiastes said, "I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all" (Eccl. 9:11).
Although God does not purpose every act of suffering, He has a purpose in allowing each act of suffering. It is to discipline us (Heb. 12:4-11), in order for us to develop patience, humility, courage, and willingness to depend upon Him.

Sometimes, people do bring suffering upon themselves as the result of sin -- for example, the mental and physical ills that stem from drinking and promiscuity. I almost hesitate to mention this point because people are all too prone to assume that any suffering they undergo is because they have done some terrible thing of which they are entirely ignorant. The suffering for sin to which I refer here is usually very obvious as to its source.
There are occasions when God pours out His bowls of wrath on mankind or sends trumpets of warning to the wicked. We will discuss this aspect of suffering in more detail later.
God sometimes places challenges before men to try their faith, as when Abraham was told to offer his son Isaac. God always wants men to do right and to grow stronger from the test. His commands sometimes involve suffering in carrying them out, but God's desire in such matters is always for our spiritual growth.
God permits nature and life to run their course. We are given life to make the best of it, not to have all our obstacles and hurdles removed. We must accept the good and the bad.

Trials are for overcoming:
From whatever source, suffering does come to everyone. We are not to take a trial and say, "I wonder if this is from God, or if this is from Satan." "God cannot be tempted with evil, and He Himself tempteth no man" (James 1:13). God provides the way of escape from temptation (1 Cor. 10:13).
If it is a matter of suffering, it may be from any of the sources we have already mentioned. The more practical question is, how should we respond when the trial comes? Job is a classic example of the proper response to a trial. He overcame and, thus, caused God to be glorified. Never did he give up his faith in God although he did not know the real source of his problems any more than we do today (Job 1-2). If we are steadfast and do overcome, then God is glorified -- whatever the source of the trial may be.

Many people begin questioning the existence of God when suffering strikes. They cannot reconcile suffering with a loving God. Is the belief that there is no purpose anything more satisfying than the belief that there is purpose in all things even when we cannot understand what it is?
One time a couple stopped all efforts to serve God. As they put it, "We have served Him all our lives, and He has never done anything for us." They were woefully ignorant and perhaps willfully ignorant as well. Do we not have our very being in Him (Acts 17:28)? Does He not maintain the very conditions of our existence (Col. 1:17)? After all, the real thing that we have as our reward for obedience to God is the promise of eternal life.

The New Testament makes it clear that the people of that day suffered also. In fact, they suffered more than we do. They were persecuted even unto death. James was beheaded (Acts 12:2). Stephen was stoned (Acts 7:57-60). Did they quit? Of course not.
Was it God's desire that the saints be tormented? No, but it was God's will that James, Stephen, and others should be faithful even unto death (Rev. 2:10)! The Psalmist said, "Precious in the sight of Jehovah is the death of His saints" (Ps. 116:15). Assuredly, God does not enjoy watching anyone suffer. He does not want someone to suffer or die in the same way a child wants ice cream. But there are other considerations which God is interested in. Sometimes these considerations must outweigh suffering or death.

To the materialist who believes there is nothing beyond death, life is more important than anything else. The political and theological liberals of our day are much more interested in the here and now than in any future life. That is why the emphasis in their thinking is social programs and things that involve this life.
To the Christian, there are many things more important than whether one lives. If one dies in order to accomplish one of these things, it is worth it. White robes were given to those who had been beheaded for the cause of Christ. They were told to "rest yet for a little time, until their fellow-servants also and their brethren, who should be killed even as they were, should have fulfilled their course" (Rev. 5:11).

Most people can accept this kind of suffering because they can see the purpose for it. But what about random suffering, suffering that "makes no sense"?
Here is a young mother. She is a tower of strength. Her husband and small children need her so badly. Then she is killed in a car accident. Why was she killed? It was an accident! God did not "push her button." There was no sinister purpose behind her death. What the living should do is to determine that her life was not in vain. Her husband can develop into a strong character. Her children can grow up to be faithful to the Lord.
There are different ways of looking at the matter. What if God could see something even worse that might happen to her or to her loved ones farther down the line if she lived? If you had been God, and you had considered averting her death on that occasion, what would you have done? Suppose you could see that she would one day fall to some temptation and be lost. Yet if she died today she would be saved. What would you have done? I am not saying this was God's thinking. We do not know what His thinking was. I am simply saying that there are different ways to consider the event.

We have already said that though God does not purpose our suffering, He has a purpose in letting us suffer. We need to understand that we also have a hand in giving thing a purpose. Let us take the lemon life appears to be giving us, and make lemonade out of it!

An old legend I read many years ago beautifully teaches some lessons about suffering. Let me share it with you:

Once the broad prairie was a wide expanse of green, waving grass. The Master of the prairie wanted flowers, so he commanded the birds, and they scattered seed far and wide. Many beautiful flowers sprang up bedecking the prairie with bright colors.
Still, the Master was unhappy because his favorite flowers were not there. He asked the prairie, "Where are the clematis and the columbine, the sweet violets, and the wind flowers, and all the ferns and the flowering shrubs?"
The prairie explained, "Those flowers can not grow in the strength of the sun's rays and before the constant blowing of the wind."
The Master, understanding what had to be done, spoke to the lightning. With one mighty slash, the prairie was cut deep to its heart. For many days the prairie groaned in agony because of the black, gaping wound in its breast.
As time passed, deep, black loam was carried down into the canyon by the stream called Little Swan. Once more, the birds strewed the seed of the flowers. After many days, the barren rocks were decked out with soft mosses and trailing vines. Its shaded grottoes were hung with clematis and columbine. Great elms lifted majestically into the sunlight. Everywhere the violets and the maiden-hair grew until the canyon became the Master's favorite place for rest, peace, and joy.
So it is with the human heart and the fruit of the Spirit -- love, joy, peace, long-suffering, and self-control. Some of these flowers will grow only in the canyon of suffering and sorrow -- particularly gentleness, meekness, long-suffering, and self-control. And, though the others -- love, joy, and peace -- bloom in the open, yet never with so rich a bloom and so sweet a perfume as in the canyon.

If your life has been rent with sorrow, and a bare, rocky canyon is left in your heart, realize that the flowers will come and grow if you will be patient and let them.

How active is God in men's affairs today?
We have discussed the laws of nature at some length -- and rightfully so. Human suffering is explained to a great extent by the operation of these laws. I do not, however, want to leave the impression that God does nothing today. It would be good to note three positions it would be possible to hold with regard to God's participation today in the events of the universe.

God is not behind anything that happens to men today. Sometimes, in order to show that miracles are not being done today, we almost put God out to pasture. The Bible teaches that God is active today.
On Mars Hill in Athens, Paul said, "He made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitations" (Acts 17:26). God's judgment against the Roman Empire, as presented in Revelation, also shows that God is involved in the affairs of men. Many other passages might be cited to show this involvement of God personally in human affairs, including the very basic premise that if there is any hope of receiving help from God through prayer, then God must be active in human affairs.

2. God is directly behind everything that happens to men today. There was among the Jews the common attitude that God was behind everything that happened to anyone, good or bad. If something bad happened, as in the case of the blind man (John 9), God was punishing that person. The apostles asked, "Who sinned, this man, or his parents, that he should be born blind?" Jesus exposed the error of this concept by saying that sin was not the cause of the blindness, but that God would nevertheless use the blindness of the man for His own purposes.
If something good occurred to someone, on the other hand, then God was showing His approval of that individual. This idea is false as is pointed out in numerous passages. In Job 21:7-16 and in Psalms 73:1-17, it is shown that often the wicked do very well in this world while the righteous suffer. Therefore, suffering cannot be an infallible implication of wickedness, nor can prosperity necessarily be a sign of righteousness.
Let me point out emphatically that there is absolutely no way we can ascertain today if God specifically causes a certain thing to happen. You see, we have no prophet to tell us that this particular drought is God-caused, or that this locust swarm was specifically sent by God. We cannot know.
If God were specifically behind every single thing that happens, we would have a deterministic world in which there would be no chance. God would personally and specifically control every event that occurred. Yet we have already shown that chance is a Biblical concept (Eccl. 9:11).
This view would also rule out all choice on man's part. Yet that man has a choice in life and in his service to God is one of the plainest lessons taught throughout the Bible. (See Josh. 24:15; Rev. 22:17.)

3. God is directly behind some things that happen today, but not all things. The process of elimination leaves us with the alternative that God does not directly specifically cause every event that happens, but He is involved directly in some things that occur. We must cannot know when He is personally and directly involved and when He is not.



Providence, prayer, and divine power:
Perhaps it would be profitable to study the manner of God's involvement with the affairs of the world. The question of how God's providence works for us and the question of how our prayers are answered are both closely related to God's involvement in men's affairs.
God operates His universe, both physical and spiritual, through laws which He has ordained. These laws are for things which are not absolute or unchanging, including man. The universe remains only because God upholds it (Heb. 1:3). It is what it is only because God makes it so. The universe is not absolute or unchanging (Heb. 1:10-12). It is only what God's ordained laws make it. Likewise, man is not absolute. He, also, must have laws to govern what he is and what he ought to be.
On the other hand, if a Being or thing is absolute, there is no law for it. God is absolute and unchanging. He is simply what He is. We can observe characteristics of His nature, but these are not features He chooses to have, but which are inherent in His being. Therefore, there are no laws which are made for Him to obey. Since Deity is the only thing with these unchanging qualities, then Deity is the only Being that exists, or that ever has or ever will exist, that is subject to no laws. He has made all laws that govern all things, but He is subject to no law Himself. We would do well to remember that.
It is God's dunamis, His power, that upholds nature itself. God channels this power into natural laws that govern the operation of the universe. He works through these laws. But just because we are limited by these laws does not mean that God is. God does not use His power to intrude upon our human awareness in a miraculous manifestation, but He nevertheless uses His power behind the curtain of nature in marvelous ways. I believe that Revelation 4 portrays God's dunamis at work upholding all things and active to perform all of the tasks God does in time and the universe (Rom. 4:5).

Our trouble is in understanding how God can exercise a special providence over us without working a miracle. What we need to realize is that from our human view, we will see providence as expressed in nature by the provisions God has made for our welfare. God will not instantly change a blue sky into a raging storm, but He can certainly cause a cloud to rise and grow into a storm. Read 1 Kings 18 and James 5:16-18. God made a cloud to rise in direct response to a prayer by Elijah. That particular cloud would not have come at that moment if God had not made it come. >From God's side, it was a deed accomplished by His power. From man's side, it was a phenomenon of nature. It was not, however, a miracle. If it had been, then James could not have used the example of Elijah's prayer as an encouragement for us to pray.
That divine power, that infinite power works for our good and awaits our prayers (Rom. 8:28; James 5:16-18). What an incentive it would be for our faithfulness in prayer is we could realize this truth.

From this reasoning, we see how God can definitely be active in the affairs of men without miracles occurring on every hand.

Seals, trumpets, and bowls:
In Revelation 6 we read about the opening of the seals on a scroll given to Christ by God. Results follow the opening of the seals. In this vision, we see God's involvement in human affairs and the results that follow. Revelation 8-11 tells of the blowing of trumpets. These are trumpets of warning to the wicked. Chapters 15-16 show the bowls of God's wrath poured out on the wicked. In these three sections of Revelation, we see the different relationship toward calamities of various kinds sustained by the Christian and by the wicked.
Space forbids an extensive discussion of these passages. Let me summarize and combine the teaching of all three by an illustration:



The Titanic was a British luxury ocean liner that sank on its maiden voyage in 1912 with a loss of at least 1500 lives. The 882½ foot Titanic was the world's largest ship at that time and was considered unsinkable. In fact, the point was boasted. The ship side-swiped an iceberg, and a three hundred foot gash was torn through the hull. It sank within three hours.
It would be interesting to speculate that maybe the hand of God was involved in this great calamity because men had made their boast and had under-estimated the powers of nature. Or, to put it more aptly, men had over-estimated their own powers. Note this point carefully however: It would be completely unfounded to affirm that God caused the accident. We have no prophet to tell us for sure. Sometimes things happen by chance. Sometimes, God makes things happen. But either way, God makes use of all such tragedies.

Let us see how God can make use of calamity by considering three imaginary people. The first is a Christian who died in the sinking of the Titanic. The second is a wicked man who died likewise. The third is a wicked man who survived.
To the Christian, the sinking of the Titanic did not come as a punishment of some kind. It was a catastrophe he was involved in, and, consequently, he died. That Christian, however, overcame because he remained faithful to God to the end and he went to a better place.
To the wicked man who died, the sinking of the ship was a bowl of wrath. He knew that catastrophes do happen. He knew he was unprepared to die. Therefore, when he died, his opportunity for repentance was forever removed. A bowl of God's wrath was poured out upon him.
The wicked man who survived looked upon those who perished and thought how easily it could have been he who perished. To him was afforded a most valuable opportunity to repent. To him, the disaster was a trumpet of warning.
God did not show respect of persons in the case of the two wicked men. He simply did not avert what happened to them, and in both cases, His purpose was served.

The secret things belong to God:
Throughout this whole study, we need to remember Moses' statement: "The secret things belong to God, but the things that are revealed are for us and for our children" (Deut. 29:29). God has a providence that works for our good (Rom. 8:28). He will act in answer to prayer (James 5:16-18). In answer to prayer, He will bless us with good and will deliver us from evil. But exactly how does He do it? We cannot answer with certainty.
The principle of God's hearing our prayers cannot be interpreted in such a way as to mean that we will never get sick or die. It is the same God who hears our prayers who says we must someday die (Heb. 9:27).
All the elements of God's purpose must be considered. One element must not be pressed to the exclusion of the other. In other words, God's care over us does not rule out His allowing suffering.
We must always pray, "Thy will be done." Our will must be subject to the Father's will. God always answers the prayers of the faithful, but He answers in His own time, and, sometimes, the answer is "No."

Questions frequently asked:
1. Is it God's will that a particular person die?
Only rarely. It was God's will that the world's population die in the flood because they would not repent. It was God's will that Nadab and Abihu die (Lev. 10); and that Korah, Dathan, and Abiram die (Num. 16). God used their deaths to teach specific lessons to His people Israel. Ordinarily, it is not God who specifically causes people to die. And today, if He did, no one could know because God does not work miracle before men today, nor is there a prophet to inform us about such activities of God today.

2. Does God know when a particular person will die?
God is all-knowing. Some say He knows anything He chooses to know. Let us not get into endless metaphysical arguments about such things. Merely because God knows a thing will happen does not mean that His knowledge makes it happen, anymore than my knowledge that spring comes after winter will make spring come. This question is closely related to the next question. Notice it.

3. If God does know that a particular person is going to die at a certain time, why does He not avert their death?
Death is ordained of God because of the entrance of sin into the world. We do not live in a paradise. Death has its purpose in God's plan. Therefore, He cannot avert death always without defeating His own purposes.
Besides, if God averted death, would it be for everyone, for just a few? If for a few, would it be only for those who asked Him to do so? That would require that one know beforehand that he is about to die so he would know to ask! How could God avert death for a few without being a respecter of persons? If He did avert death, which occasion of death should He avert, the first, or the nine hundredth? Soon, God would be forced to give eternal life on earth. That right was forfeited by man in the Garden of Eden.

4. Is a person put her to fulfill a certain obligation and then die?
Yes, but not as you might think. The writer of Ecclesiastes says, "All hath been heard: Fear God, and keep His commandments for this is the whole duty of man" (Eccl. 12:13). Most of us do not fulfill this purpose, but that is the only specific purpose God requires of accountable beings.
God has sometimes used men in His purpose without their realizing it. Isaiah said of the Assyrians, "Howbeit he meaneth not so" (Isa. 10:7). God sometimes called men for a specific mission, but those men acted as free, moral agents. God does not use men like a paper towel to be then tossed away. He takes a puny, weak, sinful mortal, cleanses him of his sin and gives him life and immortality through the gospel (2 Tim. 1:10).
Is the idea in this question that a person is put on earth to complete some important task and then to be taken away? Or perhaps, some might think that a person is put on the earth because, in the scheme of things, he is to turn on a water faucet on June 3 at 3 P.M. in the year 2,000. When he has done that, then he will die. Regardless of whether the thing be big or little that is thus performed, the idea is false. Such a concept would make each individual merely a cog in the machinery of the universe. It would require a universe in which every single thing is pre-determined. As we have already stressed, in such a world, there would be no such thing as choice or chance. Yet the Bible teaches both (Josh. 24:15; Eccl. 9:11).

5. Does God give and take away life?
After the death of his children and the loss of his property, Job said, "The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord" (Job 1:21). In the sense that in God "we live and move and have our being," we could say that God gives life. In fact, Paul told the Athenians, "He Himself giveth to all life, and breath, and all things" (Acts 17:25).
God has provided for the life force to be given, but how it is given is a riddle. It is not simply a matter of chemistry. Life is generated from life. Whether life is generated purely by physical, chemical, and biological laws, or whether God Himself puts that indefinable spark of life into each living being specifically, I cannot say for certain. I rather think that the spark of animal life is passed through the seed which contains the life germ according to God's laws.
We must distinguish between the immortal soul and the life principle which animates even the brute beast. The soul comes directly from God (Eccl. 12:7). There is no natural law that reproduces souls. But He does not snatch each person's soul away at His whim.
The laws God has ordained in nature therefore provide for the transmission of life from parents to offspring and for the eventual death of all living things. Hence, in a general way, the Lord gives and takes life. He does not do so for each specific person.

6. Can the devil cause someone's death?
In the story of Job, he was afflicted by the devil. Job's children were slain by Satan's work. He could have killed Job, or caused him to be killed, or else God would not have warned, "Behold, he is in thy hand; only spare his life" (Job 2:6).
To what extent Satan can do similar things today we do not know. He is bound (Rev. 20:2-3), but not bound necessarily in that way. It is entirely possible that he can still do these things today. It is certain that he can use calamity to seek to turn men away from God. It is Satan who does this. God cannot shield us from this temptation without removing our opportunity to exercise our free will, but shame on us if we give Satan the occasion to throw our failure into God's face!

7. Why doe we pray, "Thy will be done"?
First, because Jesus so taught His disciples (Matt. 6:10). Second, remember that Jesus prayed in the garden, "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me" (Matt. 26:39). That was what Christ desired, but realizing that would not be best, He then added, "Nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt."
The real point of this question is that since God's will is going to be done anyway, why do I have to pray that it be done? Why pray for what I want? We are to want what God wants. That is what "Thy will be done" means. However, we do not know to what extent God's will involves the details of our daily existence. It may be that God may change His will in some detail to accommodate His children when they pray to Him.
In the days of King Hezekiah of Judah, God sent the prophet Isaiah to tell the king that he was going to die and not live (2 Kings 20:1). Hezekiah wept sore and prayed earnestly to God that he not die. God sent the prophet back to tell Hezekiah that He had heard his prayer and had seen his tears. Therefore, God promised to heal him and he would not die. This story clearly illustrates that prayer has an influence upon God and may cause Him to change His will (2 Kings 20:1-11).
If God can grant a petition without upsetting His grand scheme of things, and if He feels that if would be good for us, then He will grant our prayer.

8. If a thing happens, was that God's will?
This question is closely related to the first one. The answer is, "Not necessarily." Many people will perish, but God is not desirous or willing that any should perish (2 Pet. 3:9). There are many things that have happened in history that were not God's will. This does not mean He tried to stop it and failed. We are flirting with the doctrine of determinism again. Merely because God has a will does not mean that everything is pre-determined. If that were so, then there would be no free, moral agency in man to choose his destiny. Joshua told Israel, "Choose you this day whom you will serve" (Josh. 24:14-15). Nor would there be any factor of chance. Therefore, not everything that happens is God's will, though He permits them to happen. Jesus explained that what God wanted was one thing, and what He allowed on occasion was another (Matt. 19:4-8).

9. Where is the line drawn between things that just happen and things God makes happen? Or where is the line between things under our control and things God controls?
Again I say we must reject a mechanical, deterministic view of life which would give us no control of our destiny. Likewise, we have to reject the idea that God has nothing to do with the universe. God controls all things in the sense that all things are under His laws. He does not control all things in the sense that He makes every specific thing happen. Obviously, if I am a creature of choice, I can choose some things. God also exercises a providential control over His creation. To say where a line is drawn, however, is impossible, since we have no prophet to tell us when a specific action as been taken by God.

*********


Suffering is inevitable. It is common to all men. Each Christian, with patience and faith, must endure whatever trials may come. Remember Paul's statement that "our light affliction which is for the moment worketh for us more and more exceedingly an eternal weight of glory" (2 Cor. 4:17).